The issue of anti-corruption policy, particularly in the security and defense sector, has long been one of the main ones in Ukraine-NATO relations, and an effective system for preventing and combating corruption is one of the prerequisites for the Euro-Atlantic integration of our state.
Therefore, defeating corruption is a priority and key task of the new President of Ukraine.
The problem of corruption is systemic. Therefore, its solution requires strong political will and comprehensive, coordinated measures. I guarantee the presence of political will and will provide maximum assistance in the implementation of measures to eradicate corruption.
The program (action plan) to overcome corruption in the security and defense sector is already being prepared by our team.
The unjustifiably high level of information classification is one of the reasons for corruption in the security and defense sector. In addition, Ukrainian legislation in the field of state secrets is actually formed on the basis of the Soviet one and does not meet the requirements of modernity, in particular, in terms of the informatization of society, the globalization of information systems and the conduct of information wars.
Therefore, new legislation on state secrets is needed.
The new bill on state secrets will be one of the first that the President of Ukraine will submit for consideration by the parliament. The draft, in particular, should provide for:
Ukraine currently needs to review existing defense procurement policies and practices.
Therefore, a new Defense Procurement Strategy is needed, which should determine what to purchase (choice between models), where to purchase (own production or import), how to ensure the best quality and best cost throughout the life cycle, how to support models throughout the life cycle, how to ensure the development of its own industry, how to ensure strategic independence from manufacturers of weapons and military equipment and governments of foreign states.
It is also necessary to adopt a new law “On State Defense Order”, which should harmonize the provisions on planning and formation of a defense order with the Law of Ukraine “On National Security of Ukraine”. In addition, the new law on DOZ should provide for:
The issue of Ukroboronprom management should be considered as one of the components of the systemic reform of the defense-industrial complex.
In view of this, the following steps are of primary importance:
One of the reasons for this phenomenon is the lack of political will to solve the problem. The new President of Ukraine has such political will. First of all, the system of bodies and institutions responsible for crime control, including on the contact line, should be headed by honest professionals who will be the carriers of change in these bodies and institutions. The Security Service of Ukraine and the prosecutor’s office, the Military Law Enforcement Service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine will counteract crime and corruption, and not cover it up. The second step should be an analysis of the causes and conditions that lead to the commission of relevant offenses, and an action plan to eliminate them in order to eliminate the systemic causes of the phenomenon.
First of all, an audit and inventory of defense lands, registration of ownership rights to all land plots and real estate objects are necessary. In addition, it is necessary to ensure the creation of an electronic register of defense lands and real estate under the management of the Ministry of Defense.
The existing system of providing housing for military personnel is inefficient and prone to corruption. Therefore, first of all, an audit of this system should be conducted, abuses in the conclusion and execution of investment construction contracts should be eliminated, and land plots where investors do not fulfill their obligations should be returned to the Ministry of Defense. The system of providing housing for military personnel itself needs to be reviewed and new approaches should be identified. Such approaches may include, in particular, eliminating the possibility of privatization of housing (which led to the fact that high-ranking military personnel received several apartments from the state, which they then sold) and creating instead a system of social protection for military personnel and their family members by creating a new mechanism of personalized cash severance pay.